Politicians, with no generally accepted consensus to challenge them, can get away with plucking data out of context to bolster assertions that are based more on faith than on reality.
However, there is no generally accepted consensus about specific defect-energy relations [16, 30].
The promoters are usually considered housekeeping (σA-dependent) if their −35 and −10 promoter sequences match the generally accepted consensus of housekeeping promoters.
Despite this lack of student learning evidence, there is a widely accepted consensus model of effective professional development (Desimone 2009; Wilson 2013).
A number of studies (such as [1, 24, 25, 26]) accepted "consensus" as the majority of responses in their Delphi studies.
It is anticipated that summarizing the current status of the discussion will be of help to come to a widely accepted consensus.
The promoters are usually considered "vegetative" or "housekeeping" if their −35 and −10 promoter element sequences match the generally accepted consensus of housekeeping promoters and the respective genes are expressed during exponential growth under optimal conditions.
I have to conclude that long and deep engagement in the science of gene transfer (usually but incorrectly named "GMO", as explained above) and safety testing has resulted in a blindly accepted consensus among a circle of gene engineering interests that makes any contradictory findings unacceptable.
Despite the recent increase in studies on the role of each phase, as presented here and elsewhere [58, 59, 60, 61, 62], on the possible transfer routes for charge carriers across the mixed phase titania photo-catalysts there is still no generally accepted consensus on the exact mechanisms for the synergistic effect between anatase and rutile.
