The phrase "accept as plausible" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the credibility or believability of a statement, idea, or theory.
Example: "While the evidence is limited, we can accept as plausible the theory that climate change is influenced by human activity."
Alternatives: "consider credible" or "regard as believable."
How much of this, other than the street names, is the reader to accept as plausible?
Both Generals Helmly and McNeill accept as plausible that a lone member of the Frontier Corps, whether connected to the militants or pressured by them, was responsible, but they also said it was possible that a larger group of soldiers was acting in concert.
Judge Willem van der Merwe accepted as "plausible" the explanation from Mr Zuma, 64, that he had had consensual sex with a 31-year-old Aids activist who is HIV-positive.
But although there are technical and business challenges still to be overcome, the idea that within a decade or so cars will be increasingly able to drive themselves is now widely accepted as plausible, even if the details are hazy.
Also, it is not plagued by hypothetical bias, as flood protection schemes seemed to be accepted as a plausible program to avoid future floods like the one experienced in 2007.
Any "pool" that produces pentose aminooxazolines from glyceraldehyde 8 and 2-aminooxazole 5 may also contain 15 and 16.[ 27] Furthermore, a prebiotic origin of glyceraldehyde 8 still needs to be found for the synthesis of 1 and 2 to be fully accepted as a plausible route towards RNA.
Despite a controversial history, sympatric speciation is now generally accepted as theoretically plausible [ 1– 3] and a good number of examples now exist where it appears a more likely hypothesis than allopatric or parapatric speciation [ 4– 7] (at least under the normal spatial or biogeographic definition of sympatry [ 8]).
An obvious choice to manifest interpretation experimentally is ribonucleic acid (RNA), because RNA molecules simultaneously possess evolvability and catalytic function, and the RNA World concept is currently generally accepted as a plausible stage of early life on the Earth [ 1, 7].
What do we accept as evidence?
Although the buffering and performance-enhancing mechanisms underpinning the insurance effects of biodiversity [ 4, 5] are generally accepted as being equally plausible, experimental evidence for the latter is scarce.
