The phrase "acceleration of the two" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the rate of change of velocity of two objects or entities.
Example: "The acceleration of the two vehicles was measured during the race to determine which one was faster."
Alternatives: "rate of acceleration of the two" or "speed increase of the two".
It is defined as the maximum in the time domain of the absolute value of the translational acceleration of the three components.
In addition to the simulation for the single charge state beam, the transportation and acceleration of the three charge state beams will be also examined in the test facility.
(hbox {sr} approx 0.5) which implies a similar magnitude of acceleration for the two subsystems (({||vec {ddot{varvec{q}}}_{s}||^{2} approx ||vec {varvec{a}}_{mathrm{obj}}||^{2}})).
Figure 6 shows top lateral accelerations of the two buildings in different cases.
Then, motion relations between the feature points and key points are established, 6-DoFs vibrational acceleration spectrums of the two feature points are analyzed, and 6-DoFs vibration transmissibility between them is calculated.
For this scope, we analyzed: (a) free-field ambient noise measurements obtained through an in situ survey performed in May 2014, (b) data from geotechnical boreholes located along the main roads in the study area [51], (c) geophysical profiles [39, 41], (d) acceleration recordings of the two main events and (e) aftershocks weak motion recordings from four stations located in the epicentral area.
The rather different secular acceleration power of the two versions of CHAOS-2s at epoch 2010 is due to the fact that this epoch is beyond the data span used for CHAOS-2s (only data until March 2009), while data until December 2009 were used for the updated version CHAOS-2s.
Open image in new window Fig. 9 HVSR curves (red dashed lines, left vertical axis) and average horizontal spectra (blue dashed lines, right vertical axis) using acceleration recordings of the two main-shocks at stations ARG (a), LXR (b), CHV (d) and free-field HVSR of microtremor measurements at adjacent positions (solid lines).
Comparison between predicted and field measured responses shows that the measured accelerations of the four floors are generally close to or slightly higher than the predicted values for the 75percentt confidence level, but are all lower than the predicted values for the 95percentt confidence level.
