The phrase "academic weaknesses" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing areas where a student or individual may struggle in their academic performance or skills.
Example: "During the evaluation, we identified several academic weaknesses that need to be addressed to improve overall performance."
Alternatives: "scholarly shortcomings" or "educational deficiencies".
Marines are open about academic weaknesses.
At schools here, standardized tests are used as originally intended, to identify a child's academic weaknesses and assess the effectiveness of the curriculum.
According to the Times article, "standardized tests are used as originally intended, to identify a child's academic weaknesses and assess the effectiveness of the curriculum".
Perhaps society has imposed a school reform experiment devoted to remediating academic weaknesses because we dare not confront the emotions of Harper High School.
Both the CBCL and the CPRS-R L CPRS-R Lseveral items that containe interpreted aseveraltitemsympthat of primary language impairment or acouldic weaknesses.
The five-year program, called NYPL BridgeUP, will provide academic and social support to 250 eighth graders each year at five library branches in the Bronx and Manhattan – helping them with homework, addressing areas of academic weakness and working on "Passion Projects" on subjects of particular interest.
"[R]elative academic weakness, not absolute weakness" explains why STEM students who enter college "with comparatively low credentials and an interest in the sciences tend to stream for the exits and into less challenging courses after their freshman year," Sander and Taylor continue.
Every person has different academic strengths and weaknesses and there will almost always be someone performs better academically than you do.
If my experience is any indication, it is not the best measure of someone's academic strengths and weaknesses.
We now understand our children's academic strengths and weaknesses in more detail than any report card or parent-teacher conference could provide, and we are using the time to teach subjects that we love and perhaps the kids will too.
Blanket bans on evolution and policies requiring "balanced treatment" of evolution and creationism have given way to more innocuous language, such as "teaching the controversy," "critical analysis," "strengths and weaknesses," "academic freedom," and "discussing the full range of scientific views" (Branch and Scott 2009).
