The phrase "academic acceptance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the recognition or approval of academic work, ideas, or qualifications within an educational or scholarly context.
Example: "The research paper received academic acceptance after a rigorous peer review process."
Alternatives: "scholarly approval" or "educational endorsement".
Even the novelistic form itself has traveled a hard road to academic acceptance.
Golb kept up this practice for years, publishing on news sites, blogs and Wikipedia and then referenced back to these items to give the appearance of proper referencing, peer review and a growing body of academic acceptance for the ideas of his father.
The fourth factor driving CSR's growth trajectory has been academic acceptance, enthusiasm, and proliferation.
The next step along the path toward academic acceptance of the theory of dystechnia is grounded theory building Maxwell (1996) writes: … theory provides a model or map of why the world is the way it is (Strauss, 1995).
The field gained academic acceptance in the early twentieth century, remained small through the 1950s, and expanded rapidly in response to the urban unrest of the 1960s and early 1970s.
Landmark studies on the constructive role of unconscious emotion in cognition that depends on the secondary pathway have been crucial to the academic acceptance of unconscious cognition and intuition.
As she surged forward in a search for academic excellence, acceptance and normalcy, her mother stepped forward beside her.
He wanted to be like them, so he became an assistant, first at Columbia, then at Boston College, before coming home as head coach in 1974, only to encounter the rigid academic and acceptance standards of the Ivy League.
Children face a new environment of buildings and classrooms, new school-wide and teacher expectations, new academic challenges and acceptance into a new peer group (Margetts [2005]).
On this version of the Academic interpretation, Arcesilaus' acceptance of these theses is not explained in terms of the straight-forward belief in the premises and conclusions of his arguments, of the sort which would lead a Stoic convinced by Arcesilaus to the inconsistent position examined in sect.
The integrity of his work hinges on its "outrageousness" and the sincerity of that approach becomes dubious when his long record of academic employment and acceptance in polite society is considered.
