The phrase "abuse when compared to the" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used when discussing or analyzing the severity or impact of abuse in relation to another subject or context.
Example: "The level of emotional abuse when compared to the physical abuse was often overlooked in the discussion."
Alternatives: "mistreatment in relation to the" or "harm when contrasted with the".
Anti-Arab feelings and denigration are wrong, but they are as a drop in the bucket when compared to the verbal and written abuse directed against both Jews and the state of Israel.
Simple only when compared to the life of the three generations before him, which is a saga straight out of a Judith Krantz novel, complete with a kidnapping, alcohol and drug abuse, and countless court battles.
Second, the approximate $532,000 cost of the bill is nothing when compared to the long-term costs of eating disorder treatment, let alone the effects and financial consequences of PTSD from sexual abuse and rape.
It's an outstanding fear-mongering tactic to use anecdotal evidence and paint an entire religion as aggressively misogynistic; but the reality is that women across Europe and the United States already face extraordinarily high rates of sexual abuse, especially when compared to Syrian women.
Some studies have indicated that treatments that integrate PD as 2an important component in SUD treatment may reduce substance abuse among patients with comorbid SUD and PD when compared to substance abuse treatment alone, although the integration appears to have little effect on symptoms and functioning [ 3– 5, 40].
Your line of questioning brings up a crucial point because emotional abuse can be complicated to discern, especially when compared to physical abuse since no visible wounds or scars are present; however, the impact of emotional abuse can be just as traumatic.
The more recent study found that when GPs were asked whether a patient had alcohol dependence or abuse, sensitivity was 50.4% when compared to a positive diagnosis on clinical screening instruments (CAGE and SMAST) and 74.4% compared to a diagnosis of alcohol dependence or abuse using the SCAN research interview [ 17].
A recent validity study in Goa demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity, with an area under the curve of 0 · 87 when compared to alcohol abuse and dependency criteria.
