The phrase "abuse of terminologies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the misuse or incorrect application of specific terms or jargon in a particular context.
Example: "The article highlights the abuse of terminologies in the legal field, leading to confusion among the general public."
Alternatives: "misuse of terms" or "improper use of terminology".
for each fractional partition for any collection of subsets (we call this property also balancedness, with some slight abuse of terminology).
By slight abuse of terminology, we use the same symbol F for the IFS and for the set of functions in the IFS.
In particular, "inductive completion" is abuse of terminology, since (mathsf{Ind},) is not an idempotent operation ([29] uses "indization", we stick to the old term because it sounds better).
We refer to "modified weak φ-contraction" for (2.1) in the particular case α ≥ 0, β ≥ 0, α + β < 1, and φ:R0+ → R0+ being non-decreasing as counterpart to the term φ-contraction (or via an abuse of terminology "modified strong φ-contraction") for the case of φ:R0+ → R0+ in (2.1) being strictly increasing.
It is straightforward to show the expected in-degree ((d_{in})) of an agent with out-degree (d_{out}=d) is equal to ( langle d_{in}mid d_{out}=drangle =frac{d^{alpha }}{langle d^{alpha }rangle _{P}}langle drangle _{P}).6 With some abuse of terminology, throughout the paper, the expected in-degree will simply be referred to as the in-degree.
Some signals contain many such periodic signals, in which case the problem is referred to as multi-pitch estimation, although this is somewhat of an abuse of terminology, albeit a common one, as the word pitch is a perceptual quality, defined more specifically for acoustical signals as "that attribute of auditory sensation in terms of which sounds may be ordered on a musical scale" [1].
We say that A (or, by abuse of terminology, LA) is Δ-closed if, for any formula φ of LA such that Δ ⊢A φ, there is a deduction D of φ from Δ such that D ∈ A. It can be shown that the only countable language which is Δ-closed for arbitrary Δ is the first-order language L, i.e., when A = H.
With some abuse of terminology, in such cases, we say that the corresponding subpopulations, or classes, overlap.
In the previous section we analyzed data that can be described, loosely and not without abuse of terminology, as measured on an interval scale.
