Exact(29)
To determine proteins showing significant abundance differences between the different subject groups, mean and standard deviation for each ratio was calculated across all matched MS/MS spectra, and used to determine proteins showing significant differences in abundance between the two groups.
Messenger RNA transcript abundance did not reliably predict protein abundance differences between tumours.
This study evaluated important microclimatic attributes that explain vector abundance differences between urban extensive green roofs and two control site types in humid-subtropical Hong Kong.
Long-term abundance differences between habitats were not significant (meadow – young forest, t = 1.41, meadow – advanced forest, t = 1.60, young forest – advanced forest t = 0.33).
Of the quantified proteins, 198 proteins showed significant abundance differences between pooled subjects with pre-malignant and malignant oral lesions.
For each dataset analyzed, a corresponding control dataset was also analyzed containing proteins not showing abundance differences between the two stages of oral cancer development.
Similar(31)
As a control, 198 randomly selected proteins showing no significant abundance difference between the two subject groups were also analyzed.
While our results do not indicate a differential abundance difference between the MScl subtypes and the controls, the two disease types did vary significantly in CSF levels of vitamin D-binding protein, with RR MScl showing a higher abundance.
The average absolute dinucleotide relative abundance difference between both replicons is 9.78.
The difference in genome signature between two sequences is expressed by the genomic dissimilarity, which is the average absolute dinucleotide relative abundance difference between two sequences.
The difference in genome signature between two sequences is expressed by the genomic dissimilarity, which is the average absolute dinucleotide of relative abundance difference between two sequences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com