The phrase "abundance area" is not a standard expression in written English, but it can be understood in context.
You can use it when referring to a space or region characterized by a large quantity of something, often in a metaphorical sense, such as resources or opportunities.
Example: "In the abundance area of our community garden, we have plenty of fruits and vegetables available for everyone."
Alternatives: "prosperity zone" or "wealth region".
Core abundance area richness is then calculated using the same methodology described above for "Species richness", using the core abundance maps as input.
The purpose of a core abundance area map is to represent the smallest area containing 50% of the predicted abundance of each species.
The candidate areal locations are then screened by analyzing the structural high, net thickness, sand connectivity, edge water, remaining oil abundance area et al. By summarizing all analysis in Table 3, the region 2 is selected as the pilot location region candidate.
In our case, this criterion is the presence of a significant difference in the abundance (area under a peak) of the corresponding factor between the normal and the regenerating states.
The similarity in the GOF scores for FAO, 1973 and 2000 data points to overlaps among all three estimates; we interpret this (along with comparing the map similarities) as meaning that the LM captures major fly abundance areas well, but not necessarily lower abundance areas.
Therefore, delta GAMs fitted for the different life-stage groups and seasons correctly predict qualitative differences between low- and high-abundance areas and are deemed appropriate for generating distribution maps for OSMOSE-WFS.
The abundance-area statistic (Figure 6b) follows the data trend (black line) the closest.
These statistics include box-plots, abundance-area curves, Moran's I, and classified difference.
The abundance-area statistic (Figures 7b and 8b) shows significant over-prediction of the data trend (black line).
The abundance-area statistic for all time periods (Figures 6b, 7b, 8b) is significantly lower than the observed trend.
The abundance-area statistic only slightly under-predicts the observed trend during the training time period (Figure 6b).
