Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This results in a large number of irrelevant studies, and, with an estimated 23% of studies not having indexed abstracts, results in a large number of full text articles being screened.
Similar(59)
Then SemRep processed these abstracts, resulting in 9,171 semantic predications.
Screening of abstracts resulted in 240 potentially relevant articles.
Pairs of review authors independently checked the titles and abstracts resulting from searches.
A careful manual search of the abstracts resulting from the search was subsequently conducted.
Initial screening of titles and abstracts resulted in 50 articles eligible for further full-text review.
We screened the titles and abstracts resulting from searches and extracted data.
Titles and abstracts resulting from the database search were independently screened (AB and PK).
The abstracts resulting from these queries were individually analyzed for relevance.
Evaluation on the extended 150 abstracts resulted in a precision of almost 60% and a recall of 24%.
We carefully examined all titles and abstracts resulting from these searches to determine which articles met the criteria for inclusion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com