Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The ARVO organizers require that any abstract submitted for presentation at the annual meeting that describes a concurrently controlled trial must be registered in an electronically searchable, publicly available trials register [ 8].
Similar(59)
Abstracts submitted for presentations must be scrutinised by reviewers and accepted before they can be presented.
Similarly, volunteering to review abstracts submitted for presentations at scientific conferences also is an excellent way to serve as the judge of other researchers' work.
For instance, it is not well understood what happens to abstracts submitted for presentation at meetings.
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) requires trial registration of abstracts submitted for their annual conference as of 2007.
The aim of this study was to investigate agreement on dimensions of a checklist between two referees when evaluating abstracts submitted for a primary care conference.
While abstracts submitted for scientific meetings are typically graded by a review committee, the details on the research methodology contained within the short abstract are at best very limited.
This study has shown that when using a structured assessment form, two independent reviewers were more likely to agree on design or methodological components of a checklist than on subjective components of abstracts submitted for an annual research meeting.
We have developed a reliable instrument for assessing the quality of an abstract submitted to a scientific meeting.
Abstract not submitted for publication.
Educational abstract not submitted for online publication.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com