The phrase "abstract percentage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing a theoretical or non-specific percentage, often in academic or analytical discussions.
Example: "In the study, we found that the abstract percentage of participants who preferred option A over option B was significant."
Alternatives: "theoretical percentage" or "conceptual percentage".
It's important to remember, despite the abstract percentages and statistics, that governments and business need the publics trust in order to function effectively.
The percentage of abstracts with a PC code appearing as a comorbidity diagnosis (type 1, W, X or Y) more than doubled (138%, p<0.001) between 2006 2007 and 2009 2010, with an insignificant increase (22%, p=0.368) from 2009 2010 to 2012 2013.
Table 3 Abstract Breakdown by Gender Gender Percentage of all Abstracts Percentage of Abstracts Flagged for Plagiarism Male 55%60%% Female 45%40%%.
To evaluate the temporal validity of our NDVI map, we applied an ecologic map of Barcelona for the year 2004 (Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Application 2004) to abstract the percentage of the green areas over grids of 100 m × 100 m across the Barcelona.
Table 6 Publication by study design Study design Abstracts presented Abstracts published Publication percentage Top-quartile impact factor, n Mean impact factor Prospective 289 142 49 41 (29) 3.5 Retrospective 117 57 49 11 (19) 3 Not specified 434 161 37 38 (24) 3.2 Total 840 360 43 .
Further supporting evidence includes a downward trend for the percentage of abstract presented at the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) annual meetings to reach full publication in the years after 1994.
In the Abstract and Discussion, the percentage of Guiyu children with BLLs > 10 μg/dL has been corrected from 88% in the original manuscript published online to 81.8%.
Authors' countries of origin were ranked on a composite endpoint scale of percentage of abstracts published overall.
The key surrogate marker of research quality in our observational study was the percentage of abstracts published in peer-reviewed journals.
Prospective and retrospective studies had similar publication rates (49%% vs. 48%%, respectively) (p = 0.99); however, the percentage of abstracts published in the top-quartile impact factor journals was higher in prospective studies (29 %) than in retrospective studies (19 %) (p = 0.08).
