The phrase "abstract indicated" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to an abstract that has been indicated or pointed out, but as it stands, it lacks clarity and context.
Example: "The abstract indicated the main findings of the research, but it was not detailed enough."
Alternatives: "summarized findings" or "highlighted abstract".
A primary pharmacogenetic study was defined as one in which the title of the study or the stated aims or purpose within the text of the abstract indicated that the primary intention of the study was to investigate the effect of genetic variation on drug response.
Where the title or abstract indicated that exclusion criteria were met, the study was rejected.
Full-text articles were retrieved when the abstract indicated analyses of both costs and QALYs.
Full-text articles were retrieved when the abstract indicated analyses of both costs and non-resource consequences.
Abstracts were screened and full texts retrieved when the abstract indicated data on population-level maternal mortality that is, purely facility-based studies were excluded.
If an English-language title or abstract indicated the potential relevance of a foreign-language text, the text was obtained and translated.
Signposts were abstract, indicating the trail, but not mileage to the next town.
The prefix "abstract" indicates that the theory is concerned neither with a specification of the underlying language, nor with the development of a subtheory that explains the partial order.
I nearly always read the abstract first and only continue on to the paper if the abstract indicates that the paper will be of value to me.
Minor points: The abstract indicates that 56 gaps are left in the draft genome, but Table 2 indicates 58 gaps, please reconcile these numbers.
She identified an ongoing clinical trial, 10 wrote to the researchers, and was referred to a published abstract indicating 80% success at one year.
