The phrase "abstract depends" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a relationship between an abstract concept and its dependencies, but it lacks clarity and context.
Example: "The success of the project abstract depends on the availability of resources."
Alternatives: "concept relies" or "summary hinges".
Participants rack up points for their efforts, up to 1000 per abstract, depending on how well they and other participants' markings match.
Various mid-points can be considered to be more or less abstract depending upon their relative position to these two extremes.
I've reproduced these images anywhere between 12 inches and 12 feet wide, and the images become more figurative or abstract depending on the scale.
Contrast, blending, saturation, and color schemes make some drawings more lively, or more realistic, or abstract, depending on how the color is applied.
Users are asked to build profiles describing their academic backgrounds and current projects, and can choose to upload their journal articles or abstracts, depending on what their publishers allow.
Due to the lack of an abstract, detection depends almost exclusively upon words in a title or manually applied Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).
Aristotle believed that all abstract entities depend on concrete entities for their existence.
This is the sort of account that Thomas Morris and Christopher Menzel adopt, and they are the foremost contemporary proponents of the view that abstract objects depend on God.
Historically, figures such as Aquinas (ST Ia, 15; SCG I 51 54), Anselm, and most-famously, Leibniz (e.g. Monadology 43 45)[3] claimed that abstract objects depend on God's cognitive activity (more particularly are God's thoughts or exist "in God's mind").[4] These divine thoughts aren't subject to God's will, nor is God able to think other than he does with respect to them.
