absolutely not include

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "absolutely not include" is not correct in standard written English.
It can be used when you want to emphasize that something is completely excluded from a list or consideration, but it needs to be rephrased for clarity. Example: "The guidelines absolutely do not include any exceptions for late submissions."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In other words, Johnson and Company need to "get out in front" of his existing and still-potential greatness (and earnings), and that future should absolutely not include NASCAR.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

17 human-written examples

She has been forsaken by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which has essentially written off her race and apportioned almost no money to it, and she has been dismissed by pundits, handicappers and operatives who are focused instead on a cluster of tossup Senate races in states — like Colorado, Illinois, Nevada and West Virginia — that absolutely do not include this one.

The New York Times

Such a ratio cannot exist on Facebook because unlike Twitter, it has a symmetric social graph — if you friend someone, they have to accept your friend request or else there is absolutely no connection (not including Fan pages).

TechCrunch

The man asks the audience to stop shouting and says other Spanish speakers can point out if Huerta said anything pro-Clinton, but yelling continues, including "absolutely not". .

Huffington Post

They did, however, edit the documentary on subsequent airings to include the "absolutely not".

Wikipedia

Commentary on social media included from "absolutely not cool" and "just not funny" to "get a sense of humor, people".

Los Angeles Times

Mr Dromey, MP for Erdington, told BBC News it was "absolutely wrong" not to include Acas.

BBC

"Absolutely, absolutely not.

The New York Times

Absolutely NOT!

HuffPost

Absolutely, not!

HuffPost

Absolutely not.

BMC Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clarity, replace "absolutely not include" with phrases like "definitely exclude" or "in no way include" to ensure grammatical correctness and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Using "absolutely not include" can create a double negative effect, making the sentence confusing. Rephrase to directly state what is excluded without the added negation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "absolutely not include" functions as a negative emphatic exclusion. It aims to strongly assert that something is not part of a set or consideration. Ludwig AI explains that phrase is not correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "absolutely not include" aims to emphatically exclude something, but its grammatical awkwardness can undermine its effectiveness. As Ludwig AI points out, this expression isn't standard in written English. For clearer and more impactful writing, consider alternatives like "definitely exclude" or "in no way include". While "absolutely not include" appears across various sources, from news to science, prioritizing grammatical precision ensures your message is both strong and clear.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

absolutely exclude

Removes the redundant "not" to create a grammatically sound alternative.

exclude completely

Emphasizes thoroughness by adding adverb "completely" to the term exclude.

definitely exclude

Emphasizes a clear and firm exclusion, using "definitely" for added certainty.

expressly exclude

Highlights that the exclusion is explicitly stated or defined.

specifically not include

Indicates a deliberate and pointed exclusion.

categorically exclude

Implies a complete and unambiguous removal or rejection.

does not encompass

Focuses on the idea of not being within the scope or range.

is not comprised of

Highlights the composition and what is left out of it.

in no way include

Stresses that there is absolutely no possibility of inclusion.

certainly not contain

Indicates that something is guaranteed to be absent.

FAQs

Is "absolutely not include" grammatically correct?

While understandable, "absolutely not include" is grammatically awkward. It's better to use alternatives like "definitely exclude" or "in no way include" for clarity.

What's a more formal way to say "absolutely not include"?

In formal writing, opt for phrases such as "expressly exclude" or "specifically not include" to maintain a professional tone.

How can I emphasize exclusion without using "absolutely not include"?

You can emphasize exclusion by using phrases like "categorically exclude" or "in no way include", which convey a strong sense of definitive removal.

What alternatives to "absolutely not include" focus on scope or range?

If you want to focus on scope, consider using "does not encompass" or "is not comprised of", which indicate that something falls outside a particular boundary or composition.