The phrase "absolute scientific" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used in contexts where one wants to emphasize the certainty or completeness of scientific knowledge or principles, but it lacks clarity and proper usage.
Example: "The theory was considered absolute scientific truth until new evidence emerged."
Alternatives: "unquestionable scientific" or "definitive scientific".
Partly that's because absolute scientific evidence one way or the other is impossible to collect.
So in fact what they produced was an absolute scientific nightmare.
"The climate is changing," the milder Jeb Bush has allowed, but adds, against nearly absolute scientific consensus, "whether men are doing it or not".
His kitchens are known for being rigorously monitored, for absolute scientific precision - he uses an outside hygiene consultancy and routinely sends samples off for analysis.
MIKE BROST Eau Claire, Wis., Sept. 14, 2011 To the Editor: I can't help but note that politicians like Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann, who demand absolute scientific proof that climate change is real, are the same ones who treat as undisputed fact the assumption that tax cuts for the wealthy create jobs for the unemployed.
The law is not concerned with absolute scientific accuracy in making diagnoses, but it does require a doctor with ordinary competence to exercise reasonable skill and care in reaching a diagnosis [ 24].
Yet Malick's movie — with its authentically profound considerations of the links between experience and transcendence, between ordinary life and intuitions of the absolute, between scientific knowledge and religious ecstasy — has an aesthetic, a style, a tone, a mood, which cohere with its grand ideas.
And, as you may have heard, he committed the ultimate sin in politics: he said (out loud and on camera) what he really thinks and feels, regardless of its absolute, undisputed scientific and medical falsity.
I am not arguing the absolute authority of scientific conclusions in democratic debates.
The absolute absence of scientific evidence for his existence is good enough for rationalists to conclude that he does not exist.
This is an absolute standard of scientific progress in the sense of Section 2.5.
