The phrase "absolute savings" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to finance or economics, typically referring to the total amount of savings without considering any relative factors or comparisons.
Example: "The company's absolute savings from the cost-cutting measures amounted to over a million dollars."
Alternatives: "total savings" or "overall savings".
Nevertheless, because of the chronic usage of biopharmaceuticals by many people, the absolute cost savings could be significant.
Earlier detection results in better outcomes: our model estimates an absolute cost savings of several billion dollars for a detection on the eighth day rather than the ninth.
In addition, beyond increasing the screening 'hit rate', sequential enrichment provides further absolute cost savings through smaller and smaller proportions of the total population being screened (column 3, Table 3).
Absolute cost-savings due to HPV vaccination were greatest in Scenarios E (lifetime protection for vaccine HPV types and 20 y protection for non-vaccine HPV types) and H (lifetime protection for vaccine and non-vaccine HPV types, efficacy against non-vaccine HPV types at 59.4% for the bivalent vaccine and 36.4% for the quadrivalent vaccine).
That's because if your gas bill is, say, $20 a month, you "are not going to burn too many calories" figuring out how to save 10percentt, because the absolute level of savings is low in all but the splashiest of homes.
The following data are linked within this article: energy consumption, absolute and relative savings related to primary energy, saving percentages, implemented efficiency measures and renewables.
We analyzed the claim "mammography saves lives" by calculating the life-saving absolute benefit of screening mammography in reducing breast cancer mortality in women ages 40 to 65.
We can summarize our results by converting the life-saving absolute benefit of mammography in the various screening subsets that we have analyzed into the life-saving percentage of events in each subset.
In other words, by subtracting the one life saved in each prospective screening subset, there is no life-saving absolute benefit for 22 women with screen-detectable cancers, or for 2969 women screened once.
We also developed two additional statistics for the life-saving absolute benefit for a screening intervention.
