The phrase "absolute risk increased" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to health, statistics, or risk assessment to describe a rise in the likelihood of an event occurring.
Example: "The study found that the absolute risk increased significantly for individuals who smoked."
Alternatives: "overall risk heightened" or "total risk raised".
For both sexes and all regions of residence, the absolute risk increased with age.
The absolute risk increased over time, and after >15 years of follow-up the absolute risk of DRP was 2,769/100,000 person-years in patients with T1D and CD versus 920/100,000 person-years in the T1D cohort (excess risk of 1,849/100,000 person-years) (Supplementary Table 1).
A similar distribution pattern was observed among the 1045 patients treated with radiotherapy alone and the 2064 patients treated with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy; the relative risk, but not the excess absolute risk, of solid SMN decreased with time after first treatment; the excess absolute risk increased during a period of at least 30 years after the first cancer.
Even when both vaccine effectiveness and influenza incidence rates were low, the absolute risk increases observed in our simulations under these conditions were extremely small.
We found that clinically important bleeding was associated with an increase in mortality (absolute risk increase, 20 30%; RR increase, 1 4) and an increased length of ICU stay (approximately 4 8 days) using three different analytic methods.
The absolute risk increases (ARIs) ranged widely from 2.6 to 29%% (mean 13%%) such that the number needed to harm also ranged widely from 3.5 to 38.5 (mean 20) (Table 2; Fig. 2).
The intervention harm signal was remarkably wide: Absolute risk increase ranged from 2.6 to 29%% (mean 5%%), and the number needed to harm ranged from 3.5 to 38.5 (mean 20).
We recorded source of sponsorship, geographical settings, sample sizes, randomization, blinding interventions used, absolute mortality rates, absolute risk increase (ARI), odds ratios, relative risks and number needed to harm, whether or not each RCT had a DSMB, pre-specified interim analyses, whether or not there were pre-specified stopping rules, and whether or not each RCT was stopped early.
We found wide ranges in sponsorship (industry or not), type(s) of intervention(s), use of DSMBs, presence of interim analyses and early stopping rules, absolute risk increase (ARI), and whether or not adequate prior proof-of-principle Phase II studies were done of RCTs that found increased mortality rates of the intervention compared to control groups.
Our hypothesis was that there would be wide ranges in sponsorship (industry or not), type(s) of intervention(s), use of DSMBs, presence of interim analyses and early stopping rules, absolute risk increase (ARI), and whether or not adequate prior proof-of-principle Phase II studies were done of RCTs that found increased mortality rates of the intervention compared to control groups.
A study of a group with a mean dosage of aspirin of 270 mg per day estimated an average absolute risk increase in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) of 12 events per 10,000 persons.
