The phrase "absolute liability" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to refer to a situation where a party is held responsible for damages or harm without the need to prove negligence or fault.
Example: "In cases of absolute liability, the defendant is responsible for the harm caused regardless of the circumstances."
Alternatives: "strict liability" or "no-fault liability".
It is essentially absolute liability".
Under such circumstances the court was justified in refusing to instruct upon the doctrine of absolute liability.
Paul Rosenzweig of the Heritage Foundation notes that the immunity is written as "a complete and absolute liability protection for monitoring activity".
However, the Senate bill set a limitation on the amount of absolute liability at $125 a gross ton, or $14‐million, which aver was less.
Examples of this last type, called absolute liability, vary from one legal jurisdiction to another but may include, for example, the ownership of dangerous wild animals.
The doctrine of strict or absolute liability is ordinarily reserved for abnormally dangerous activities for which no degree of care can truly provide safety.
The whole rule and especially that aspect of the rule which permits recovery by a person who was not the target of the defendant embody a strong social policy including obedience to the criminal law by imposing an absolute civil liability to anyone who is physically injured as a result of an intentional harmful contact or a threat thereof directed either at him or a third person.
Both causal elements have traditionally been accepted as virtually absolute prerequisites to liability under the fault system, suggesting that in practice the law has considered market deterrence to be a crucial goal of tort law...
The convention lays down detailed rules on the issuance and contents of the appropriate documents of carriage (passenger ticket, baggage check, and air waybill) and enforces them with the penalty of absolute and unlimited liability.
2. Petitioner, as a former President of the United States, is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts.
From the history discussed above, however, all that can be concluded is that absolute immunity from civil liability for the President finds no support in constitutional text or history, or in the explanations of the earliest commentators.
