Sentence examples for absolute condemnation from inspiring English sources

Australia offered "absolute condemnation" and New Zealand expressed worries about the test, as did India.

The fact that infidelity, for example, is a fact of biology must, for any thinking person, modify any "absolute" condemnation of it.

In 1989, as a theologian, he declared that "the absolute condemnation of same-sex relationships of intimacy must rely... on an abstract fundamentalist deployment of a number of very ambiguous texts".

Bob Brecher, for example, provides a criticism of the ticking bomb scenario (which is basically the scenario Walzer uses in his original paper on dirty hands) and from a purely consequentialist perspective endorses the need for an absolute condemnation of torture (Brecker 2007).

You are taking a few verses out of context and extracting from them an absolute condemnation that was never intended.

My condemnation is absolute and my anger is profound (healthy and a thousand times justified) against this horror!!!" At times like this, inevitably, there is a tendency to view things in Manichean terms, and to suppose, as Huntington postulated, that we are engaged in a "Clash of Civilizations," with us on the one side, and the Muslims — wherever they are — on the other.

The significant fluctuations (EDF = 3.97, F = 6.42, p < 0.001) in the number of unfit carcasses being condemned in small slaughterhouses must be interpreted with caution given the small absolute monthly number of condemnations.

REFERENCES "Condemnation Without Absolutes," by Stanley Fish, The New York Times op-ed page, Oct. 15, 2001.

Stanley Fish's Oct. 15 Op-Ed article, "Condemnation Without Absolutes," is like a balm cooling the fever of war jingoism.

In "Condemnation Without Absolutes" (Op-Ed, Oct. 15), Stanley Fish supports Susan Sontag's view that the word "courage" can be applied to terrorists who sacrifice their lives for a cause.

In "Condemnation Without Absolutes" (Op-Ed, Oct. 15), Stanley Fish defends postmodernism and contends that there can be no independent standard for determining which of several interpretations of an event is true.