The phrase "absence review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where an evaluation or assessment of absences is being discussed, such as in a workplace or educational setting.
Example: "The HR department will conduct an absence review to determine the impact of employee absenteeism on productivity."
Alternatives: "absence assessment" or "absence evaluation".
Several transcriptional regulators are implicated in regulation of Sry based on the reduction of Sry expression in their absence (reviewed in Sekido and Lovell-Badge, 2009 and Warr and Greenfield, 2012).
Our findings on scattering shows that the core literature in diabetes epidemiology is concentrated in a small number of core journals, and that in the absence of reviews, one can follow the field by reading these journals.
In the absence of judicial review, this committee should act as an in-house vetting group, and perhaps as a counterbalance to prosecutors.
The Economist published a blank page with an apology to its British readers for the absence of a review that had been printed in all its other editions.
The Justice Department disagrees, and has asked its Office of Legal Counsel to prepare an elaborate memorandum asserting that presidentially ordered assassinations comply with due process despite the absence of judicial review.
First, I think that the answer that they did it differently -- different people interpreting the general standard differently -- would not raise a problem even in the absence of judicial review of that.
The AHRC is particularly concerned by the growing instances of detention in prisons of those with cognitive disabilities for lengthy periods without releasing them into more appropriate facilities and in the absence of regular review by an independent tribunal.
Though the three-judge panel that issued the ruling was deferential to the administration, Chief Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson 3rd, a conservative stalwart, warned that in the absence of judicial review, "any American citizen alleged to be an enemy combatant could be detained indefinitely without charges or counsel".
It also notes that researchers have not always correctly identified bots — flagging media reports which it claims have "recently highlighted how users named as bots in research were real people, reinforcing the risks of limited data being used to attribute activity, particularly in the absence of peer review".
But many researchers fear that the absence of peer review will reduce the quality of submissions and force readers to wade through electronic mounds of poor-quality results in search of tidbits of worthwhile science.
