The phrase "absence prevalence" is not commonly used in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing the frequency of absence in a specific population or situation, but clarity may be lacking without additional context.
Example: "The study aimed to analyze the absence prevalence among students during the pandemic."
Alternatives: "absence rate" or "frequency of absence".
In view of the absence of prevalence differences in MZ and DZ twins, social interaction effects were not included in the genetic model.
Such convenience-within-probability surveillance could provide statistically valid estimates of disease absence and prevalence by reducing the effect of bias generated by sampling on a first-come-first-served basis.
Although these methods of convenience sampling are often assumed to be representative of a population, sampling biases (most notably selection bias) do occur, making it difficult to develop statistically valid estimates of disease absence or prevalence, regardless of how many birds are sampled.
The absence or low prevalence of HIV, syphilis, and anti-HCV precluded subsequent analysis of correlates.
The absence of significant prevalence differences suggests that the presence of sibling interaction or rater bias is considered implausible.
The sample size was calculated for the worst support absence's expected prevalence: 50% (maximum possible uncertainty) in each subgroup (native and immigrant) and the following assumptions: 4% precision, 95% confidence interval, 20% beta risk and 20% loss.
Further documentation of this absence of a prevalence gradient should be confirmed with studies using broader definitions of disease (for example, undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy). Gout has become more prevalent in China, a phenomenon also seen the United States in recent years.
The absence of a prevalence peak in the preschool years may reflect the almost complete absence of children with monoarticular or pauciarticular JRA in the IHS user population, consistent with previous studies in non-European populations [ 5, 7, 8, 13, 15, 32, 33].
Based on our optimised and sensitive PCR systems, a low proportion of samples were found positive are well in line with the reports of absence or low prevalence of AAV, irrespective of the nature of the samples (Grossman et al, 1992; Odunsi et al, 2000).
One other potential limitation of our study is that the absence of sero-prevalence data for the period under study makes it impossible to determine if the observed findings were due to any differential out-migration of HIV positive persons from the slum areas.
