The phrase "absence of terminology" is correct and can be used in written English
It is typically used to describe a situation where specific and precise terms are lacking or missing in a certain context. An example of using this phrase in a sentence could be: "The scientific journal article was difficult to understand due to the absence of terminology used by the researchers."
As this phrasing suggests, the term knowledge is often used, in absence of better terminology, to describe this very strong type of informational attitude.
The limited previous research suggests that the absence of explicit terminology (e.g., use of the term Alzheimer's) is problematic.
This is particularly important in neuroscience in light of the absence of standardized terminologies [2], leading to the constant need of domain expertise to reconcile confusing, conflicting, or inconsistent nomenclatures.
Key challenges identified include research overlap, lack of strategic research agenda, absence of consensus regarding terminology, and limited coordination between stakeholders.
While it may be one of the main tasks routinely performed, ventilator setting readings had the worst results of all tasks, probably because of the absence of a homogenized terminology among manufacturers.
The absence of a common terminology and structured knowledge organization can hinder the understanding of studies' contexts, making the studies harder to analyze and compare as well as aggregating the results from similar studies.
In contrast, labelling the problem as a mental health-related problem, with absence of specific psychiatric terminology, was associated with lower levels of stigma on these latter two scales.
Searching for relevant studies in this area is challenging because of the absence of a common terminology for interventions in which practitioner empathy and communication of positive expectations is manipulated.
The first one relates to the absence of unique reference terminologies and definitions of measurement properties.
This view, which rests partly on the near absence of the relevant kinship terminology in Homer, is not ultimately convincing in its hypothesis of a kind of complicated collective fraud on posterity.
The absence of a comprehensive precancer terminology severely limits the clinical value of research that includes precancer specimens.
