The phrase "absence of significant differences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as research findings, statistical analysis, or discussions about comparisons where no notable differences were found.
Example: "The study concluded with an absence of significant differences between the two groups in terms of performance."
Alternatives: "lack of meaningful differences" or "no notable differences observed".
The absence of significant differences persists even after observing patients with different patterns of treatment, as observed in Table 5, among people prescribed with insulin, with oral hypoglycemic medication, or with antihypertensive medication.
Despite absence of significant differences, the control strategies might theoretically lead to different detected prevalences and these should be highlighted.
A comparison of the modeled and the measured SOC shows absence of significant differences in the means.
According to Pedneault and Beauregard (2014), the reason for an absence of significant differences based on victim characteristics was unknown and should be subject to further investigation.
However, the major result of this study is represented by the absence of significant differences in sputum proteins between the three clinically defined subgroups of asthma: classical, cough and chest tightness variant asthma.
Instead, the absence of significant differences could be attributed to the present conceptualization of disposal (i.e., the specific indictors used) and the lack of availability of other information that would allow for a different conceptualization.
Conclusion: Few studies address men with migraine and these results highlight the absence of significant differences in headache disability, kinesiophobia, fear of falling, according with sex, with found scores moderate-to-high for all migraineurs.
The absence of significant differences in pain perception was also found between patient groups defined as patients with MwoA CA- and with MwoA CA+ compared to HC, at any level of experimental stimuli.
At baseline, before randomization, all emphysema animals were evaluated during PSV to confirm the absence of significant differences in arterial blood gases and respiratory parameters between PSV and PCV (Additional file 4: Table S3).
In general, the absence of significant differences (confirmed by low ES levels) indicates that the levels of distress across both genders cannot be generically associated with the risk of suffering from abusive conduct.
The absence of significant differences between the age groups for some items should not be interpreted as evidence that older drivers should all be treated as one collective group.
