Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Evaluations of gender-based interventions have been consistently criticized for their lack of methodological rigor.
Strength of evidence was limited by choice of study design, sample size, and lack of methodological rigor.
This level of methodological rigor distinguishes development of the BD Sx from prior scales developed for BD research and clinical practice.
We limited the review to published studies in order to maintain a consistently high standard of methodological rigor.
The issue of methodological rigor was variously addressed.
Third, a lack of methodological rigor is common amongst the studies included in reviews.
We could not address the effects of methodological rigor on conclusions, because the topics of the individual studies differed.
This failure to increase the degree of methodological rigor in published research is of concern because significant resources are used conducting studies of poor methodological quality and such research may produce scientifically invalid conclusions that influence future research and policy.
One could hypothesize that papers with group authorship are potentially larger studies, of higher methodological rigor, and of possible greater general interest.
Because a scoping review is not intended to assess the quality of studies, emphasis was not placed on methodological rigor of the retained studies.
Again we are reminded of the multifaceted trade-offs between methodological rigor and the goal of a more global estimate of frequency of LGT in prokaryotes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com