The phrase "above the systematic" is not commonly used in written English and may be unclear without context.
It could be used in discussions about concepts or ideas that transcend systematic approaches or frameworks.
Example: "In our analysis, we must consider factors that operate above the systematic level of understanding."
Alternatives: "beyond the systematic" or "outside the systematic".
As mentioned above, the systematic target perturbation of the adaptation paradigm triggers corrective saccades, at least during the initial phase of adaptation time-course.
As noted above, the systematic review produced mixed findings concerning the relationship between gender and outcomes and Wolfe et al.'s (2009) evaluation of the Fourth R programme was the only study to show better outcomes for boys.
11– 13 As stated above, the systematic review reported by van Haastregt et al identified two trials showing a significant reduction in the number of falls in an intervention group with preventive home visits and also four trials not showing any effect of intervention.
Nonetheless, several findings from the review emerged that were consistent with some of the results from the above systematic reviews, which included some of the same studies.
Among Palestinian the linear association with age and the gender disparity were consistent with the evidence from the above systematic reviews.
In contrast to the above, systematic dependences of the QP sizes or morphologies on the primary amine were not observed.
The trials included in the above systematic reviews have largely excluded people with CI and only one large, adequately powered randomized controlled trial has been conducted that has specifically included people with CI [ 10].
To explore the generality of the above trends, systematic experiments were also performed in ultrafine-crystalline pure Ti produced by equal-channel angular pressing where a reduction in grain size was found to cause an increase in fatigue crack growth rates at different tensile load ratios.
For example, the published ACC/AHA guidelines, which were included in the above systematic review of perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy, date back to 2007/2009 [ 12, 14].
Many of the above systematic errors can be avoided by filtering out potentially troublesome subsets of the data: probesets with extremely low variability (saturated), probeset with low inclusion levels (close to background), and genes with extremely high differences in expression levels across samples.
First round: Based on the above described systematic review, panel members will be asked to rate the importance of the patient-relevant outcome domains to assess the effectiveness of MPT/FR on a nine-point Likert scale in the context of (1) effectiveness studies and (2) daily recordkeeping.
