The presented procedures and experimental results demonstrate the above mentioned method as an effective analytical tool for the study of water jet geometry and velocity fields.
Therefore, the stability of the above mentioned method was investigated, as showed in Fig. 5.
The range of proper solvents for use with the above mentioned method is limited as the solvents must have low volatility and low solubility in water to be immiscible with water and as the analytes must be soluble in it.
A sample problem is solved using the above mentioned method.
The proposed method outperforms above mentioned methods.
The above mentioned method has been implemented as a post-processor of a finite element software.
Novel results obtained from difference dilatometry for copper are compared with results obtained by the other above-mentioned methods, as well as with results previously obtained for pure nickel.
The presented approach differs from methods described in the above mentioned works as our procedure does not search for the quickest/shortest way to a secure or appointed area (Zarrinmehr et al., 2013) but for the path first of all accessible, and as convenient as possible.
However, conventional geostatistical methods cannot be employed to achieve the above mentioned uses as they have a number of limitations.
In another data procession workflow, baseline-subtracted fluorescence ratios, which were determined in a way similar to the above mentioned linear regression method, were also provided as Supplementary Material 4, 5,6 [see Additional file 4, 5, 6].
In an attempt to avoid some of the above mentioned problems, quantitative or semiquantitative methods such as MethylLight® quantitative MPS, pyrosequencing, COBRA, etc. [ 66, 67, 70, 83, 87, 89, 111] have been reported by different groups in recent years.
