The phrase "above mentioned estimate" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form is "aforementioned estimate."
Example: "In our previous meeting, we discussed the aforementioned estimate for the project budget."
Alternatives: "previously mentioned estimate" or "estimate mentioned above."
By means of the same process as in the above mentioned estimates, we see that biglVert bigl(x t),phi_{p^bigl y(t bigr bigr bigrVert _{p} < varepsilon e^{-kappa} for (t_{0}+ kappa-1)T le t le t_{0}+kappa T) and (kappainmathbb {N}).
As the above mentioned estimates were based on herds with a clinical suspicion of infection with C. burnetii or another infectious agent as e.g. Neospora caninum, it is reasonable to assume that the true population prevalences during the years 2003-2007 were lower than the above mentioned high risk sample estimates.
We argue that applying the new and still more costly techniques are likely to only marginally improve the above mentioned parameter estimates that can be obtained with the old tools.
When the diversity values are used in the above mentioned equation, an estimate of 5 × 10-7 and a minimum estimate of 1.2 × 10-7 is obtained for the mutation rate (per site per generation) for Malus and Pyrus, respectively.
Table 1 gives the values of the above mentioned model parameters, estimated on the basis of [11] and the report by Mayer and Hurst [9] on their experiments with calves which are hopefully not much different from humans.
After adjusting by BMI in addition to the above mentioned variables, our estimates of the association between high SUA levels and hypertension and between high SUA levels and the presence of three or more risk factors decreased, nonetheless, they kept their statistical significance (Table 4).
Both functions can be easily estimated using the above mentioned Kaplan-Meier estimator regarding ith achievement of CCyR or death before the ith CCyR and ith loss of CCyR or death before the ith loss of CCyR, respectively, as the events of interest.
Similar to the above mentioned study, the risk estimate for perceived exertion in the current study remained significant when potential confounders such as age, sex and computer use time were controlled for.
Thus, the above mentioned discrepancy between the estimated and advertised accelerometer bias values would then lead to an error level of about 5%and2.5%5% for GRACE and CHAMP, respectively, in terms of the mean non-gravitational acceleration and the derived air drag values (Eq. (2)).
