The phrase "above as large" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to compare something mentioned earlier in a text, but it lacks clarity and context.
Example: "The font size should be the same as the one used above as large."
Alternatives: "as large as mentioned above" or "as large as stated earlier."
According to Cohen, an effect size of 0.2 is considered small, 0.5 as moderate, and 0.8 and above as large [ 20].
Cohen's D was used to calculate between groups and within-group effect sizes (ES), and ES 0.2-0.5 were considered small, ES 0.5-0.8 0.5-0.8and ES 0.8 and above as large effect sizes.
Based upon Cohen's suggestions, effect sizes of 0.2 to 0.5 have been regarded as being small, those of 0.5 to 0.8 as moderate and those of 0.8 or above as large [ 28].
To interpret effect size, we followed the suggestion of Cohen and regarded effect sizes of 0.2 0.5 as small, 0.5 0.8 as moderate, and 0.8 and above as large [ 11, 26, 27].
For Cohen's d, an effect size of 0.2 to 0.3 can be interpreted as a "small" effect, around 0.5 as a "medium" effect and 0.8 or above, as a "large" effect [ 50].
The effect size for Chi-square was based on Cramer's phi (V) and the effect size correlation directly from the Student T test as "r" (Pearson correlation coefficient), in which a value between 0.1-0.29 was determined as a small effect size; 0.3-0.49 as a medium effect size; and 0.50 or above as a large effect size.
Effect sizes of 0.2-0.5 0.2-0.5arded as "small", 0.5-0.8 as "moderate" and above 0.8 as "large" [ 9].
In line with criteria suggested by Cohen, effect sizes of 0.2-0.5 0.2-0.5arded as "small", 0.5-0.8 as "moderate" and above 0.8 as "large" [ 23].
Effect sizes between 0.20 and 0.49 will be judged as small, between 0.50 and 0.79 as medium, and above 0.80 as large [ 20].
Cohen suggested that standardised effect sizes of 0.2 to 0.5 should be regarded as "small", 0.5 to 0.8 as "moderate" and those above 0.8 as "large".
Differences of 0.1 – 0.29 in the Fisher's Z-values were classified as small effect sizes; differences of 0.3 – 0.49 were classified as medium effect sizes and those above 0.5 as large [ 35].
