The phrase "above argumentation" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used when referring to a previously mentioned argument or reasoning in a text, but it is more common to use "the argument above" or "the argument previously mentioned."
Example: "In the above argumentation, the author presents several compelling points to support their thesis."
Alternatives: "the argument above" or "the preceding argument".
An example in Figure 7 which demonstrates all aspects of the above argumentation is the case of lower leg landmarks in the top view for jackdaws.
Based on the above argumentation, several important features of UI program – some sharply deviating from an OECD-style program – can be recommended.
By the above argumentation, together with Lemma 2.2 and m ( S ( x ) ∪ S ( y ) ) = ∞, at least one of the following inequalities holds: ∫ B + x ( t ) | x | ⩽ ∫ 0 m ( B + x ( t ) ) x ∗ < ∫ 0 t x ∗ or ∫ B + y ( t ) | y | ⩽ ∫ 0 m ( B + y ( t ) ) y ∗ < ∫ 0 t y ∗. for 0 < t ⩽ t 1.
Besides the above argumentation regarding the density and the solubility in water, there is another point that must be considered.
From the above argumentation, flaws may very well be induced during manufacturing of both Denzir and Procera copings.
From the above argumentation, it can be seen that different mental models are not necessarily good or bad but that the way they are handled during a handoff is what actually matters.
Owing to the uniqueness of this solution, the above argumentations are true for any subsequence of ({varepsilon}) chosen at the beginning of the proof.
Although the above arguments are all valid from a teacher's point of view, what really matters is how students "handle" the different type of images: to what extent are they able to follow our argumentation?
In the example above, the argumentation "Take antibiotics.
From the above and by similar argumentations as in Steps 1-3 of the proof of Theorem 8(I) we conclude that all assumptions of Theorem 8(I) hold and the assertion (A1) of Theorem 8(I) does not hold.
However, the argumentation above can be carried out for any pair of different tax rates.
