Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "about what members" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It can be used when discussing topics or issues related to members of a group, but it needs additional context to be meaningful.
Example: "The discussion was primarily about what members of the committee thought regarding the new policy."
Alternatives: "concerning the members" or "regarding the members".
Exact(4)
But it also implies an old idea about what members of the so-called weaker sex must do to get what they want: use their charms and wiles to put men off their guard.
Well now they've got a no-nonsense, working mum from Manchester, so what are they still complaining about?" What members and activists want above all is an end to infighting and a more consistent focus on attacking the Tories.
When the regulation under consideration is not paternalistic, Mill's libertarianism points explicitly to law and social morality to resolve boundary questions about what members of a society owe one another.
Because members are signed into their LinkedIn accounts when they're reading, sharing and discussing, more information about what members are reading may provide better data to power the company's premium search tools.
Similar(56)
Don't worry too much about winning, just learn what members are capable of so in the next match you have a better chance of beating them.
About what motivates members, delegates and officials.
But Buerkle had considerable control over the flow of information about what staff members were investigating.
But statements by the two trustees raised questions about what board members knew and how they expected the money would be spent.
Blair, before I arrived, had been briefed about what individual members of the family had said to me and now how they might like to qualify their views and statements.
There is no set time for the commission to make a ruling and no clear understanding about what its members are trying to determine in parsing the details of the KUSF sale.
And once again the questions were not so much about the dollar savings as they were about what many members of the committee said would be a shift in policy and a reneging on old promises.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com