Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(13)
I thought about this distinction between the man and the myth a lot over the weekend.
For a time the authorities appeared to be clueless about this distinction, causing investor alarm.
Thomas Frank has written a fascinating new book about this distinction, "What's the Matter With Kansas".
Some colleges will care very much about this distinction (most, actually) and will look at references, essays, and, where available, interview reports to help them make this determination.
"Really?" you think, "Are you serious?" I take it Ben Elton means us to laugh at Gerard Wright's prejudice at this moment and not with it, but I'm not convinced that the studio audience much cares about this distinction.
Test takers were not aware about this distinction (OECD 2013).
Similar(47)
If Mr LaHood's story checks out, they should be just as embarrassed about getting this distinction wrong, too.
This raises the question about why this distinction was not made for deriving classical expected utility solutions.
At this point you're probably asking yourself why we're so adamant about making this distinction, and it's because what we found wasn't great.
The discovery of a set of compounds with selectivity for AFB5 also raises a question about why this distinction might have developed.
However, we cannot yet provide precise guidelines about where this distinction occurs in biological systems, although we empirically observe that the model produces equal estimates of pool proportions across all lineages and high tree uncertainty when confronted with very highly mixed samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com