Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "about the drones in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a topic related to drones, particularly in a specific context or location.
Example: "The report focuses on the concerns about the drones in urban areas and their impact on privacy."
Alternatives: "regarding the drones in" or "concerning the drones in".
Exact(1)
So what about the drones in Libya?
Similar(59)
There have been no discussions about deploying the drones in the near future, but Neiman said they could prove extremely useful to officers when dealing with heavily armed suspects.
"Of course we should be asking questions about the use of the drones in the context of international law," said Reinhard Bütikofer, a Greens party leader and German legislator in the European Parliament.
Reports that the United States may target another U.S. citizen for death because of his alleged involvement in terrorism are troubling, especially in light of unanswered questions about the drone attack in Yemen in 2011 that killed the U.S.-born Anwar Awlaki.
The handy thing about the drones is that in addition to this, they can also spot asylum seeker boats, so the Navy can get to them faster and tow them back more efficiently.
That would be unacceptable under any condition, but it's completely ridiculous when you take into account the fact that a) there have been voluminous news accounts of drone strikes, including the one on Mr. Awlaki, and b) pretty much every top government official involved in this issue has talked about the drone strikes in public.
The United States Embassy in Baghdad referred all questions about the drones to the State Department in Washington.
It was also clearer than ever this week that Trump has absolutely no idea what he's talking about on health care ― other than the droning in his head that Obamacare is "a total and complete disaster".
The suit cited public comments made by President Obama, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and other officials about the drone program in arguing that the government could not credibly claim a secrecy defense.
In March, a former top Pentagon lawyer, Jeh C. Johnson, similarly appealed for greater openness about the drone program in a public speech, though he also cautioned that "the reality is that it is much easier to classify something than to declassify it".
"One of the really striking things about this document is the central role that the NSC is apparently playing," he said, "both in programmatic decisions about the drone campaign and in the so-called nominating process.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com