The phrase "abolish second" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to the elimination of a second term or a second instance of something, but without context, it is ambiguous.
Example: "The committee decided to abolish second readings of the bill to expedite the process."
Alternatives: "eliminate the second" or "remove the second".
Campaign to abolish Third World debt - the new millennium's most pressing cause.
Travelling by train, he's asked if he will abolish first class.
There is also the whole matter of symbolism: as George Orwell reflected soon after the war, the Labour government's failure to abolish first-class rail travel was all too emblematic of its broader failure to carry through an egalitarian social revolution.
It is possible to abolish first phase apoptosis or second phase remodelling, or to shorten the first phase by accelerating the rate of apoptosis.
It is simply not true that abolishing second incomes and taxpayer funded expense accounts will bring about a less high quality species of MP.
If the majority were to control all branches of government, he declared, "debts would be abolished first; taxes laid heavy on the rich, and not at all on others; and at last a downright equal division of everything be demanded and voted". French statesmen such as François Guizot and Adophe Thiers expressed similar sentiments well into the 19th century.
It was amazing, but it also felt dangerous, because the division between night and day is a border, perhaps the most fundamental one we have, and up there it was abolished, first in an eternal night, then in an eternal day.
If the majority were to control all branches of government, he declared, "debts would be abolished first; taxes laid heavy on the rich, and not at all on others; and at last a downright equal division of everything be demanded and voted".
Debts would be abolished first; taxes laid heavy on the rich, and not at all on the others; and at last a downright equal division of every thing be demanded, and voted.
Abortion, affirmative action and pornography," he goes on, "present somewhat more complex moral challenges, but it is baffling to me how a person of good will, after examining these issues with care, could conclude that it would be either wise or good to criminalize the first, abolish the second and abridge civil liberties in order to extirpate the third".
