The phrase "abnormality that would" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing a specific abnormality and its potential implications or consequences.
Example: "The doctor noted an abnormality that would require further testing to determine its significance."
Alternatives: "irregularity that might" or "anomaly that could".
Such overdiagnosis often leads to further tests and biopsies to determine if a tiny tumor looks dangerous, followed by surgery, radiation or chemotherapy to eliminate an abnormality that would never have caused illness.
However, a limit of 19 weeks applies in cases where the pregnancy was the result of rape and 24 weeks where there is a threat to the life or health of the woman and in cases of foetal abnormality that would result in a serious congenital defect.
If elevated levels of IEG proteins in Tc1 mice are a protective response to elevated levels of oxidative stress, they may be a compensatory response in Tc1 (and DS) and not an abnormality that would be beneficial to alter directly with pharmacotherapies.
It is designed to pick up abnormalities that would otherwise progress into harmful problems.
Laboratory examinations did not reveal abnormalities that would have indicated organ disorder or active inflammatory processes.
One reason why scans may not always benefit overall health, despite their impressive ability to peer inside the body, is that they can find abnormalities that would never have killed you, leading to unnecessary worry and treatment.
The NDMA should also help doctors detect early cancers, because it is capable of running special computer programs on top of the archive that scan every part of an image, using algorithms to detect abnormalities that would be missed by the human eye.
We could not identify particular defects or abnormalities that would suggest a specific step in embryogenesis being dependent on mp66α.
The high prevalence of visual abnormalities that would then require treatment, and their relatively poor sensitivity and specificity for high grade premalignant lesions would make visual inspection a poor choice as a feasible single test approach to cervical cancer screening in this population.
Most infants in our study had a clinical picture and/or supratentorial CUS abnormalities that would eventually require MRI examination.
A radiologist inspected anatomical images for potential abnormalities that would preclude their use in voxel-wise analyses.
