The phrase "abnormality rate we" is not correct and does not form a coherent expression in written English.
It appears to be an incomplete thought and lacks clarity, making it unusable without additional context.
Example: "The abnormality rate we observed in the study was higher than expected."
Alternatives: "the rate of abnormality we" or "the abnormality rate that we".
In addition to the abnormality rates of adults, we compared the "total" abnormality rate ("total" means the inclusion of all abnormalities in the adults and the deaths of the larvae, prepupae, and pupae) in the May and September F1 generation samples.
In May, we obtained an average abnormality rate of 12.4% in the P generation and 18.3% in the F1 generation.
In addition, we obtained the offspring generation (defined as the offspring or F1 generation) from the collected adults, and we obtained the total abnormality rate (tAR), which includes deaths at the larval, prepupal, and pupal stages and the morphological abnormalities of the surviving adults.
We're talking about an abnormality rate of maybe 30percentt in cloned animals.
Here, we investigated spatial and temporal changes of the abnormality rate (AR) in both field-caught adult populations and laboratory-reared offspring populations of the pale grass blue butterfly, Zizeeria maha, which has generation time of approximately one month.
Although the background abnormality rate of adults in Z. maha is approximately 12.2% on average, we considered that the abnormality rate of adults more than 15% for field-collected samples and 20% for laboratory-reared samples warranted an explanation (see Point 6).
Additionally, in the September samples, we observed high correlation between ground radiation dose and abnormality rate (see Figure 4b in the original paper [ 1]), which was not observed in the May samples.
The mortality rate and the abnormality rate were defined as percent dead or percent abnormal and dead (and hence, total abnormality rate), respectively.
To examine if the abnormal traits were heritable, we obtained the F2 generation from the May samples and estimated the abnormality rate of adults as 33.5% on average.
An abnormality rate for each group was calculated by dividing the number of abnormal individuals by the number of individuals that were safely subjected to morphological examinations.
