The phrase "abnormality for each" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be used in contexts discussing specific abnormalities related to individual cases or items, but it requires additional context for proper understanding.
Example: "The study aimed to identify the abnormality for each patient in the clinical trial."
Alternatives: "anomaly for each" or "irregularity for each".
A new measure combining these two tests, the structure function index (SFI), was defined in 3 steps: 1) calculate the probability that each visual field point is abnormal, 2) calculate the probability of abnormality for each of the six HRT optic disc sectors, and 3) combine those probabilities with the probability that a field point and disc sector are linked by ganglion cell anatomy.
The application, called the Results Manager, incorporates extensive decision support features to classify the degree of abnormality for each result, presents guidelines to help clinicians manage abnormal results, allows clinicians to generate result letters to patients with predefined, context-sensitive templates and prompts physicians to set reminders for future testing.
As defined, the SFI produces one probability of structure-function abnormality for each point tested in the visual field.
To calculate the probability of abnormality for each visual field point, we require reference data for each of those points.
That resulted in lower prevalence of abnormality for each component as well as for the metabolic syndrome than in other ethnic groups (Table 2).
First, there has been no attempt to combine quantitatively structural and functional deficits using continuous probabilities of abnormality for each measure.
The distribution of the participants in each group according to the LossGain coding system consisting of both absolute (abnormal Z-scores) and relative (abnormal side-to-side difference) abnormalities for each and combined examination modalities is presented in Additional file 2: Table S2.
To analyze these EEG abnormalities, for each raw recording, the Hilbert transform of the signal was calculated.
Images were initially assessed for scanner artifacts and gross anatomical abnormalities for each subject.
The Northern [19] scoring system (Table 2) gives an integrated score for all pulmonary abnormalities for each of the four lung quadrants.
Urine and blood collected for laboratory analysis showed no difference in the frequency of abnormalities for each analyte as a function of vaccine or dose.
