The phrase "abnormalities in the study" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing unexpected or unusual findings or issues that arise during research or analysis.
Example: "The researchers noted several abnormalities in the study that could affect the overall results."
Alternatives: "irregularities in the study" or "anomalies in the study".
Based on the literature, we estimated the prevalence of macrovascular abnormalities in the study domain to be 40%.
For example, in a UK cohort study of ocular outcome after premature birth, which involved 558 children born before 32 weeks of gestation in 1990-1991, abnormalities were more frequent among drop-outs, and complete-case analysis thus underestimated the prevalence of ocular abnormalities in the study population [ 4].
We did not find such a difference, but on the other hand none of the patients in our study had a tourniquet time shorter than 63 min. The high incidence of EMG abnormalities in the study by Saunders et al. could have been due to the high TCPs of 350 450 mmHg, regardless of tourniquet time.
Importantly, the dentate abnormalities in this study were present in the unexplained group infants with both recommended and unrecommended sleep environments, and with and without possible suffocation.
We could not explore the association between the development of skeletal events and the presence of medullary abnormalities in this study owing to the short follow-up period.
We cannot rule out temperature extremes or genetic mutations as causes of the eye abnormalities in this study, but chemical contaminants are unlikely candidates, based on the lack of correlation with roads and associated environmental contamination.
Significant prolongation of AV nodal, and to a lesser extent His-Purkinje, conduction times was noted in the control group, but no conduction abnormalities occurred in the study group receiving augmented atrial hypothermia.
None of the abnormalities seen in the study were apparent on conventional MRIs.
To date one study compared CT-colonography with MR-colonography in the detection of colorectal abnormalities in the same study population [ 19].
There were no significant laboratory abnormalities in the two study groups.
The most common all-grade and grade 3/4 AEs and hematologic abnormalities in the DASISION study are shown in Table 3.
