The phrase "abnormal trials" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to research, experiments, or clinical studies where the trials deviate from the norm or expected outcomes.
Example: "The researchers observed several abnormal trials that raised questions about the validity of the initial hypothesis."
Alternatives: "irregular trials" or "atypical trials".
Any abnormal trials (i.e., due to apparent epileptic spikes) did not significantly affect our decoding analysis.
As object-context relationships are learnt over time, based on real life pairing frequencies [18], conflicting or abnormal trials can be experimentally regulated by altering the object-context pairings into less probable ones.
A likely strategy employed by subjects in abnormal trials may be an attempt to organize novel object-context pairings into a framework of prior knowledge and use this information to guide and bias aesthetic judgments [43].
In other words, our decoding approach automatically and objectively pruned the influence of abnormal trials and electrodes, without relying on any subjective criterion for removal of a subset of trials and electrodes (e.g., apparently large amplitude or apparent epileptic spikes).
"I find it abnormal that the trial is being held behind closed doors," his mother, Ruth Halimi, said during a break in the trial.
The main reasons for ineligibility during volunteer screening for the clinical trials included abnormal laboratory parameters and medical abnormalities.
Eli Lilly & Company said yesterday that it had terminated its agreement with Sepracor, a small drug company, to make a new version of the antidepressant drug Prozac after some patients taking the new formulation in clinical trials developed abnormal heart rhythms.
[A1.] Eli Lilly Ends Sepracor Agreement Eli Lilly said that it had terminated its agreement with Sepracor, a small drug company, to make a new version of the antidepressant drug Prozac after some patients taking the new formulation in clinical trials developed abnormal heart rhythms.
(1) To systematically collect and organize into clinical categories all outcomes reported in trials for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); (2) to rank the importance of outcomes for patient decision making; and (3) to improve future comparisons of effects in trials of AUB interventions.
Consistent with these findings, our data suggest that the left temporal pole may be engaged during evaluation of affectively salient information and thus a differential evaluation strategy in abnormal than in normal trials.
The specific clinical signs we analyzed were those used as entry criteria in the cooling trials with abnormal aEEG as an additional criterion [ 15- 17].
