The phrase "abnormal measures" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe actions or steps that deviate from the norm or standard practices, often in a context where unusual circumstances require different approaches.
Example: "In response to the unexpected crisis, the management decided to implement abnormal measures to ensure the safety of all employees."
Alternatives: "unusual actions" or "extraordinary steps".
These criteria sets differ because of the number of data points within the sets, the number of required abnormal measures within a criterion, and the cutoff value of each measure.
Although the sensitivities of the S3 were low (13%-52%) for identifying patients with abnormal measures of left ventricular function, the specificities were high (85%-95%), with the best test characteristics exhibited by phonocardiography and more experienced physicians.
Some differentially expressed miRNAs directly correlated with abnormal measures of lung function, as recorded on their medical charts.
Only if cardiac function were still abnormal, measured by an absolute FS of <29% or a change in EF by ⩾20%, would cardiac DLT be reportable.
Moreover, abnormal VFC measures were correlated with social dysfunction but measures of self-concept were not.
Abnormal vascular measures could result from transient, inflammation-induced endothelial dysfunction and not from atherosclerosis per se.
The rate of abnormal laboratory measures during TGC treatment was similar between the two groups (P = NS).
In the overall population the rate of abnormal laboratory measures during the treatment period was similar between SD and HD TGC-treated patients.
The presence of ≥ 2 abnormal clinical measures (blood pressure, blood glucose, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides) according to the strict criteria was considered diagnostic for MetS.
These data included demographic characteristics, medical history, clinical and laboratory findings, the simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, the occurrence of abnormal laboratory measures, type of treatment and outcome.
These optimal stage thresholds suggest that abnormal CSF measures, atrophy rate, cognitive test scores and hippocampal and entorhinal volume provide the best prediction of conversion in ≤2 years, whereas just abnormal CSF, atrophy rate and ADAS-Cog and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test scores is the combination that best predicts conversion over a period of 3 to 5 years.
