Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "able to veto changes" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the authority or power to reject modifications or alterations in a decision-making context.
Example: "The committee is able to veto changes to the proposed budget if they do not align with our financial goals."
Alternatives: "capable of rejecting changes" or "authorized to block changes".
Exact(1)
Because of the immense costs, television and film producers didn't want writers to be able to veto changes; for their part, writers wanted their relationship with their work to be more than that of widget maker to widget.
Similar(59)
It has enough legislative seats reserved under the constitution to veto changes to the constitution.
Portugal, worried about the impact of the changes on fishing revenues, voted against the law, ministers said in a statement, but it was not able to veto the agreement.
Should they be able to veto federal spending?No.
You'll never be able to veto an EU treaty.
The press should not be able to veto appointments.
Independence Labour/Lib Dems The press should not be able to veto appointments.
In effect, unelected officials would be able to veto national budgets of eurozone members.
Beginning in July 2003 it will be able to veto decisions by national regulators.
It will be able to veto government policies if 80 per cent of council members vote to do so.
In practice this has meant that, since then, countries have been able to veto any proposal they dislike.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com