The phrase "able to fight at" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing someone's capability or readiness to engage in a fight or competition at a specific location or event.
Example: "The team is able to fight at any venue, showcasing their adaptability and strength."
Alternatives: "capable of fighting at" or "prepared to fight at".
Whether one thinks a boxer who is 30 years old is "young" or not is a matter of perspective but, for whatever reason, boxers are now able to fight at a high level far beyond that.
"We have to be able to fight at least somewhat of an equal footing or we'll be a bunch of suckers and they are laughing at us," he said. .
You can always fight at a lower tier, but you will not be able to fight at a higher tier than you have unlocked.
In the face of these new enemies, typified by al-Qaida, the mass armies of nation-states are highly ineffective, cumbersome to deploy, difficult to manoeuvre, and from a domestic point of view, overly dependent on a citizenry that is both willing and able to fight, or at least to have their children fight for them.
She was able to fight for me at my school at various points.
The Army chief of staff, Gen. Ray Odierno, the former commander in Iraq, points out that the Army had 480,000 people in uniform before the Sept. 11 attacks, and at that number was supposed to be able to fight two wars at once.
"If it hadn't been for legal aid, I wouldn't have been able to fight the case at all".
Enthusiasts for the revolution in military affairs think it ridiculously expensive, and impractical, to stick to the policy of being able to fight two wars at once.
Their capacity is in sharp contrast to the Syrian regime, which is only able to fight one battle at a time and has to fight hard for every success.
But whatever the truth of Irving's death, the idea that anyone could hurt a person who, by definition, is the least able to fight back, claws at the gut of human decency.
He said he would also dock $614m in performance fees for the contractor, Lockheed Martin.The review seeks to break with the old requirement that America should be able to fight two major wars at the same time.
