The phrase "ability to compete effectively" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing competitiveness, performance, or skills in various fields such as business, sports, or academics.
Example: "The company's ability to compete effectively in the market has led to increased sales and customer loyalty."
Alternatives: "capacity to compete successfully" or "competence to compete efficiently."
"The combination of these companies will enable us to achieve tremendous efficiencies," Andrew J. Schindler, Reynolds' chairman and chief executive, said in a statement, "and will greatly enhance our ability to compete effectively in the U.S. market".
"We haven't had the ability to compete effectively with Black Friday, and now we do," said Andy Page, president of the Gilt Groupe, who predicted that poaching in-store shoppers would lead to Gilt's best Black Friday ever.
Oliver Watson, managing director at PageGroup, who undertook the research, says: "If this trend continues, we risk creating a generation of generalists, which will undoubtedly hinder individuals' career development and ultimately damage the UK's ability to compete effectively in a global economy".
"We're confident that the transaction would bring benefits for customers and not undermine other players' ability to compete effectively in any individual services or bundles.
So far, both Amazon and eBay have had no choice but to operate as online marketplaces in India, limiting their ability to compete effectively with local rivals such as Flipkart.
In a letter to the FTC, Thet says "I have no concerns about my ability to compete effectively after the transaction closes," and "this is such a rapidly growing and evolving industry that I have no concers about Google and AdMob dominating the space".
I have no concerns about my ability to continue to compete effectively after the transaction closes.
This defect is due to mutations in RRM2, which result in reduced the binding specificity of Npl3 [42], [42], and reduce the ability of the protein to compete effectively for binding to polyA/termination sequences [12].
These findings demonstrate that the ability of the channel to adapt its structure differently to K+ and Na+ is a fundamental aspect of ion selectivity, as is the ability of multiple K+ ions to compete effectively with Na+ for the conductive filter.
Any strategy the company adopts that appears too aggressive is immediately called monopolistic, which limits the company's ability to compete as effectively as it otherwise could.
