The phrase "abilities of decision making" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing someone's skills or competencies related to making choices or judgments.
Example: "The manager emphasized the importance of developing the abilities of decision making among team members to enhance overall performance."
Alternatives: "decision-making skills" or "capacity for decision making".
The technical efficiency change measures the ability of decision making unit to catch up on the shift of production frontiers (catch-up effect) by comparing the efficiency of that unit over the two years when the efficiency is calculated using the production frontier in the same year to which data refer.
The findings also showed that for a number of experts, wider concepts including autonomy, rationality, voluntariness and motivating factors behind the decision were felt to be integrally related to mental capacity and would need to be explored as part of a comprehensive assessment of decision making ability.
These brain volume deficits may result in impairment of critical abilities such as decision making, executive functions and social cognition skills.
Technical efficiency (TE) refers to the ability of a decision making unit to produce maximum output that is feasible from a given level of inputs (i.e. maximizing output from a given level of inputs).
Because of the medium's ability to preserve the stages of decision-making on separate sheets and because of the distinctive look of different techniques combined to bracingly dissonant effect, it exposes the artist's process with particular lucidity.
Emotion Management Task measures the ability of incorporating one's emotions into decision making.
To facilitate comparisons between clinical studies, four classes (or "generations") of telehealth have recently been proposed on the basis of the type of data transfer, decision making ability of the care provider reviewing the data, and level of integration of all systems with the patient's primary care structure.
For achieving an effective supply chain management some requirements should be met such as technology, agility of system, decision making ability, and inventory levels (Khorasani et al. 2015).
A process evaluation of the shared decision making ability of the general practitioners during the complete study.
A process evaluation of the shared decision making ability of the general practitioners will be measured in the intervention group at baseline and after 12 months, and in both treatment groups at 24 months.
Women's lack of autonomy and decision making ability in the study setting plus the sensitivity of some issues (e.g., HIV, sexually transmitted diseases, violence against women) also mean that a group approach cannot completely replace the need for individualized counselling[ 12].
