The phrase "aberrations for which" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to specific deviations or irregularities that are being discussed or explained.
Example: "The scientist documented the aberrations for which further research was necessary to understand their implications."
Alternatives: "anomalies for which" or "deviations for which".
My patient Charlie did not show up for his appointment this month, an aberration for which I am deeply, selfishly grateful.
The army spokesman said soldiers fired because the ambulance was racing toward them, and he called the incident a "tragic aberration" for which he extended the army's apologies.
A discrepancy is visible in the case of spherical aberration, for which the dip at position ≈ 100 μm does not appear in the simulations.
The lack of correlation between DNA methylation and genomic aberrations in genes for which both methylome and copy number alterations are available in the Discovery cohort can be seen in Table S5.
Although published data implicates non-canonical Wnt signalling as a positive regulator of cell migration [ 30, 32, 33], DLG1 has been broadly implicated in maintaining integrity of the epithelium, aberrations of which are responsible for certain human diseases [ 34, 35].
This tactic was historically dubious and politically disastrous, but it stemmed from the liberal conviction, as old as the Enlightenment, that peace was normal and war an aberration or crime for which clear responsibility guilt could be established.
Introducing a parameter θ>0 that determines the sensitivity of the aberration calling (and hence what to consider as biologically significant aberrations), we call probes for which z ^ j < − θ as losses and probes for which z ^ j > θ as gains.
Significant relationship between the gene copy number changes and expressions was found for seven genes: MRPS23, MSN, LSM3, ANXA4, MBNL2, FLJ13291, and MGC14151, for which aberrations were detected in 5 23 tumors.
The genome-wide DNA methylation and genomic aberrations in tumor samples for which both methylome and copy number alterations are available in the Discovery cohort can be seen in Figure S3.
By closing the FD, we measured the speckle size for several values of the FOV, calculated the corresponding dCV size (Figs. 5(a), 5(b), 5(c) and 5(d)) and computed the defocus slope to determine the FD range for which aberrations can still be estimated (Figs. 5 e) and 5(f)).
