The phrase "abduction device" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to science fiction, crime, or discussions about hypothetical scenarios involving kidnapping or alien abduction.
Example: "The story featured an advanced abduction device that could transport individuals to another dimension."
Alternatives: "kidnapping tool" or "capture mechanism".
Considering the characteristics of this study, there seems to be no strong rationale supporting the use of an abduction device in growing children.
From the data of this study no rationales were found indicating a sufficient effect of this abduction device in the presented treatment context.
From data of this study there is no strong rationale supporting the use of an abduction device in growing children, however, the results have to be weighted according to the characteristics of the study design.
In a retrospective study on 106 children no difference was obtainable between a group of children treated with this abduction device and a group of children neglecting such devices.
Usually, the use of abduction devices is expanded until walking onset at approximately age 8 month.
However, comparing abduction devices of young babies with the presented abduction splint one has to consider a major difference: Abduction splints in young babies always combine abduction with hip flexion.
For treatment purposes authors introduced abduction devices such as harnesses providing abduction and flexion [ 20- 22] Graf Class II b hips are defined as hips of babies older than three month, exhibiting an alpha angle of 50 59 degrees.
As much as the effect of early abduction devices (harness etc). is known, several authors further recommend the use of rocking horses and toys with abduction for late cases of hip dysplasia [ 25].
Not only do the pods looks like alien-abduction devices straight out of Lady Gaga's "Bad Romance" video, but the thought of re-entering the womb is just creepy.
Both devices detected lower hip abduction ROM in patients compared to controls (P < 0.01).
Interestingly, the agreement between the two devices was high for hip abduction and internal rotation, but low for flexion, adduction, and external rotation.
