The phrase "abatement option" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to environmental policy, finance, or legal discussions where options for reducing or eliminating something undesirable, such as pollution or costs, are being considered.
Example: "The company is exploring various abatement options to minimize its carbon footprint and comply with new regulations."
Alternatives: "reduction choice" or "mitigation option".
In addition, the percentage of domestic inputs, both labor and capital, used in the abatement option increases over time for developing countries.
The findings of this paper are relevant to project developers, power generators and policymakers globally who have an interest in the potential for CCS to provide an emissions abatement option for existing thermal assets in the short and long term.
First, we assess the abatement option with focus on the operation time in the emission control areas (ECAs).
According to the Lake Winnipeg Stewardship Board (2006), retention basins should be further reviewed to determine how effective and appropriate they can be as a nutrient abatement option in Manitoba.
This will support the development of management options and to assess the ease of implementation of the selected abatement option and also to allow identification of "low hanging fruit".
The province of Manitoba is committed to reducing downstream nutrient loading and has expressed interest in retention basins as a nutrient abatement option (Bourne et al. 2002; Government of Manitoba 2014; Grosshans et al. 2014; Lake Winnipeg Stewardship Board 2006).
It offers policy makers a new tool to assess CO2 abatement options.
Furthermore, in an energy system, actions unrelated to climate change abatement might likewise affect the performance of abatement options.
One such tool is the MACC (marginal abatement cost curve), used to capture the least-cost sequence of abatement options.
Different abatement options have been considered, depending on the source and the operating conditions of the process.
The critical unit costs are defined as those that would make an emitter indifferent between various abatement options.
