The phrase "abatement could be" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential actions or outcomes related to reducing or lessening something, such as pollution or costs.
Example: "In the context of environmental policy, abatement could be a crucial strategy for mitigating climate change."
Alternatives: "reduction might be" or "diminution could be".
At 160 °C and 2.0 MPa with an initial phenol concentration of 1000 mg/L, 100% phenol conversion and 76% total organic carbon abatement could be achieved after 120 min reaction.
To limit the atmospheric emissions of carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas, it has been proposed that one method of abatement could be to inject the CO2 into deep saline formations.
An obvious course correction would be a cash injection for the emissions reduction fund, a vestige of the heavily criticised Direct Action scheme, and the environment minister has already flagged the ERF's remit (which is currently paying for abatement) could be broadened to include the protection of threatened species.
Nearly 40% of abatement could be achieved at negative marginal cost, according to the report.
The report stated: "Our research suggests that the net cost of achieving these levels of GHG abatement could be quite low on a societal basis" (McKinsey 2007).
In order to meet these emission requirements, there are diverse abatement technologies that could be adopted by ship owners.
In a 2012-13 reporthehe Australian National Audit Office noted that the abatement metrics at the time "could be better balanced to increase the focus on the quality of services provided to detainees".
A study by McKinsey & Company last year argued that most of the carbon abatement needed between now and 2030 could be achieved with existing technologies, things like insulating homes, improving fuel efficiency, and switching to concentrated laundry detergents to reduce packaging and transport costs.
However, no matter where your property is, if your guests repeatedly cause a statutory nuisance to your neighbours, you could be served with an abatement order and penalised by your local authority.
"This new law has changed that calculus," said Ms. Talel, noting that in some buildings a majority of owners will no longer qualify for the abatement, and therefore the lump sum paid to buildings could be much smaller.
The gradual decline in ages above 70 could be explained by the overall age-dependent abatement seen in the general population.
