The phrase "a year when public" is not complete but can be correct in a broader context.
It can be used when discussing events or trends that occurred in a specific year related to public matters or public opinion.
Example: "It was a year when public sentiment shifted dramatically towards environmental issues."
Alternatives: "a year of public change" or "a year marked by public interest".
The cost to the British people of this half-baked venture is a staggering £5bn a year, when public services are being slashed.
David Brindle, the Guardian's public services editor and chair of the judges, said: "At the end of a year when public trust and confidence in big charities has been called into question, it's heartening to be able to cast a spotlight on five outstanding smaller charities that are doing so much for so many people who find themselves on the margins of society".
2016 could be a year when public discontent kindles a commitment to real reform.
2015 is unlikely to see much improvement given it is an election year when public sector contract awards typically slow.
So far, though, state legislators - in the midst of an election year, when public officials are traditionally disinclined to raise taxes - have shown no inclination to act on the tax package.
As a result, 2015 could well be the year when public service professionals need to speak out.
A day of public readings is organised on the third Friday in November each year, when public figures read aloud for free.
Allowing that £200m to go begging every year, when public service broadcasting is in long term decline, cannot be the right answer.
But in a year when the public's anti-establishment fervor seems to be growing, Mr. DiNapoli's legislative career and deep roots in Albany could work against him.
In January of 1999, she spent eighty thousand dollars to buy twenty-five hundred shates athirty-twowo dollarsharehare — a distinctly minor financial event in a year when Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia went public, giving her, for a time, a net worth of more than a billion dollars.
It's even more significant that a film of its subject and caliber would be nominated in 2014, a year when the American public, thanks largely to Edward Snowden, is reconsidering what it means for a free society to commit to an open-ended global war.
