In order to validate that using object words as probes brought memories of the crime simulation to mind, an independent group of participants (N = 10) completed the crime simulation followed by an old/new recognition test, where words referring to objects from the burglary were intermixed with new object words, and participants judged whether a word corresponded to an object from the burglary.
Thus, a p in the beginning of a Finnish word corresponds to f in Hungarian (puu: fa); a Finnish k is matched by Hungarian h before a back vowel (a, o), otherwise by k; within the word, Finnish t is matched by Hungarian z, and nt by d; Finnish initial s sometimes corresponds to Hungarian sz and sometimes to no consonant at all (syli: öl).
The full model uses the entire vocabulary for the class layer, in which each word corresponds to a separate cluster.
They come in many different forms, some of which are described below: Silly sentences: A fun mnemonic device for remembering specific problem words is to make up sentences in which the first letter of each word corresponds with a letter in the word you are trying to spell.
The first letter of each word corresponds to a basic metric prefix, in order of largest to smallest, except for the "U" in "Until", which corresponds to "unit," or the metric base units (meter, liter, etc).. List the prefixes on a line.
(iii) Parity judgement: In the seventh run, participants were asked to decide mentally whether the presented number word corresponds to an even (i.e., 0, 2, 4, 6, 8) or an odd number (i.e., 1, 3, 5, 7, 9).
This fun word corresponds to one billionth of a gram.
In BOW, each word corresponds to one dimension of representation.
At a minimum it might have consisted merely in the accurate mapping of a language's vocabulary onto the natural genera and species that constitute reality, so that each word corresponds to precisely one entity.
If the grammatical form of (40) is simply '{Juliet [kissed Romeo]}', then the mapping from grammatical to logical form is not transparent; and natural language is misleading, in that no word corresponds to the event quantifier.
